Why democracy failed.........

Democracy is an ancient concept--we are time and again reminded of its roots in the Greek civilization throughout our history classes at school, through art and literature from that era and through documentaries uncovering archaeological evidence from those times. Yet I believe we are currently at a stage where we need to refresh our concepts on democracy and reevaluate our systems to see where we erred. What we have now in the name of democracy is what is left after the corruption and corrosion of a concept that 'was logically intended to work'. In today's complex world the parameters that have to be regulated have increased so rapidly that it is difficult to arrive at any 'quick fix' for restoring our democratic systems.

All novel concepts, all revolutionary concepts are discovered with an amazing zest and an extraordinarily positive vision. The preceptor of any concept does not necessarily incorporate complete foresight during formulation because he does not require to--his idea may not be utilized at the time he thinks of it. Likewise, the person or the people who incorporate the novel concepts generally do not have the luxury of time and peace to evaluate the ramifications of the concepts in the future. The present itself is nebulous enough for them, the future is similar to a blackhole. Then why do all great ideas,all path-breaking concepts end up as convoluted knots around us that we seem incapable of untangling ourselves from? I feel the answer lies in the way we implement them and how it filters through society. Marxism, democracy, world peace, revolution--they have all failed the test of time and in some cases, failed irreparably. Marxism became an excuse for deterring the economy of countries, democracy a ridicule of public rights, world peace a means for competing for resources and revolution a loose term for uncontrolled anarchy. Why have we reached a stage where the meaning and significance of democracy have been lost? This is not a rhetorical question and yet there is no single answer to this. The most important factor to consider in this regard is that there are two types of failed democracies--ones that have succumbed to their own internal pressures and the ones that are democracies by all external appearances while the system is subject to infestion by its own internal parasites.

Religion is one of the most significant factors that play a role in the maintenance of democracy in recent times. The goal of all religions is one, what we should be imbibing from each of them also pertain to the same principles--of goodness, humanity and faith. Yet when we look at intra-national disturbances in countries like Israel, Bosnia, Sudan and inumerable others we are forced to ask ourselves the question--where did we lose all those principles? We let them dwindle away in our quest to interpret the tenets of our religion and in our zeal, we left the actual purpose of interpretation far behind. Instead of allowing our faith to be our anchor through the crests and troughs of life and letting it make us conscious and responsible human beings, we have made it an excuse for bigotry, intolerance and a reason to ignore the global issues in the light of religion.

A few days ago I was watching a documentary on Egypt that provoked several issues and left a trail of unanswered questions. In the University of Cairo, professors are dismissed and imprisoned for free speech and the advocation of fundamental human rights. Watching people from different sects in Cairo interview with the documentary reporters, it occurred to me that the religion itself (in this case, Islam) is not at the root of the inability to establish a functional democracy in Egypt. The failure is in other factors--in the adaptation of people to a non-democratic system. They have convinced themselves to believe that Islam operates more smoothly under a monarchical or dictatorial regime. This is the point where religion is dictating the mentality rather than enlightening it. A student in the university inferred that the Egyptian people are not yet 'ready' for democracy and therefore, it would a mistake to assume that it could work in the country. This statement from a youth was not encouraging--the youth of any country are the planters of the seeds of revolution, of progressive thought. In several Islamic countries leaning towards progression like Egypt, the youth are like those of any other nation--eager to learn, impatient to make their mark with lofty ambitions on improving the system for the society. However, when they stumble against the roadblocks of deeply-rooted thoughts and habits, ingrained since centuries and a lack of population to discuss and attack the issue of political change, they find themselves unable to continue on the lines of their dreams for social evolution. The state of Egypt is the state of all those nations where citizens have been convinced that Islam is incompatible with democracy--a conviction that cannot break barriers until people realize that social systems are not necessarily a function of interpretations or opinions of religion--they are a function of the religion itself and what is faith if not a
medium to progress towards an improved and uplifting life?

A significant factor that has also been instrumental in deferring the establishment of democracy is the global competition for control of natural resources. Ever since the agreement of free trade between nations and continents, the western world has been involved in a continuous quest to control the flow of resources and finances. A nation is considered to be rich when it has an abundance in resources but what is the current state of all these rich nations? Fuel, precious stones, water to name just a few have become liabilities for the nations that possess them. African countries like Sudan, Rwanda and Sierra Leone have been embroiled in artificially created domestic feuds to allow external parties to regulate the flow of resources in and out of the countries. When trade and economy are involved in politics the common citizen's voice cannot be heard in the overall sound of the nation. The tight control of resources leads to an even tighter control of currency and dialogue--international dialogues take place between the individuals holding the reins of regulation. The Shahdom in Iran was a direct consequence of international involvement in trading resources. The dictatorships in countries like Sierra Leone,
Somalia and Sudan began as nations vied for possession of their natural resources--by-products of these conditions are a flourishing arms and weapons industry that not only fosters civil violence in such countries but also maintains it.

These are disturbing situations and the conclusions that we can draw from them compel us to reflect upon our own role in the gradual erosion of democracy. A global change has to be the effort of the citizens of this world--have we ever denounced anything or sacrificed on any of our own luxuries so that maybe some other individual in a different part of of the world can have a better quality of life? We may not have tried to reduce our fuel consumption, give up wearing diamonds or stop wasting water but it is time for us to at least initiate the process. Demands are created by consumers and when economy and money are the two strongholds in a nation's survival and well-being, it is our duty as human beings to be more aware and conscious as consumers. Religion is not an excuse for muffling public opinion and resources are not weapons to cut a nation's throat with. Nature is continuous but we are not--we are already heading towards an age of depleting resources so why deplete ourselves too in the quest for more? We ourselves are one of the most promising resource that we have so why not channel our energy
into creating for mankind rather than destroying mankind itself in the name of what was meant to nurture?